This weekend educators will be recognized with a red carpet, black-tie event in Washington, DC.
No, not a state dinner, not even a White House reception, it is something better. It is the 2nd annual Bammy Awards for Educational Excellence. I know, you’ve never heard of them.
The Bammy Award
It is a sad state of affairs when the ceremony aimed at recognizing the good work of education workers also suffers from a lack of recognition. But we have an opportunity to change that.
This year the Bammy Awards are being broadcast live on the web. You will see us arrive in our limousines and step out onto a red carpet. There will be people interviewing us. Then you will get to see handsome statuettes distributed an impressive award ceremony that is surprisingly fast paced because award winner speeches are limited to two sentences. Really. Wittiness is encouraged.
I can tell you from experience that it is extremely difficult to write a good two-sentence acceptance speech, I have tried. I am one of the five finalists in the school librarian category, just added this year, so I had to do it . There should be no chance I will win since I am up against four of the top school librarians in the country and I am barely qualified to do shelving for them. Even so, I have to have a two-sentence acceptance speech ready.
I know you have a life and better things to do on a Saturday night than watch an awards show, but you can tune in and be snarky just like you are watching the stars and wanna-be actors arrive for the Academy Awards. Pay particular attention to the women’s shoes, there has been a lot of posting on Facebook about their finds. 99% of the men, including me, will be wearing rented tuxedos, you can tell because they won’t have chalk on them.
And if you miss the live stream of the event, it will be archived and available for viewing any time.
So please, give some recognition to the ceremony recognizing school people. It will trickle down to us eventually.
Leave a Comment » | Contemporary Issues, Education, Equity, Leadership, Learning, Library, Teachers, Technology | Tagged: Academy Award, Award ceremony, black-tie, Educators, recognition, Red carpet, White House | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
Narsarsuaq Airport, Greenland. Terminal, Nanoq Duty Free shop. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Today sent my principal an email telling him I am underutilized.
I have seven assigned teaching periods a week, slightly more than 1 per school day. Our day is eight periods long. I have open access two lunch periods every day. The rest of the time I am allegedly doing “library administration.” As far as I can tell after two years of doing the job, library administration takes about 10-20 minutes a day which I spend re-shelving books. When I still have money to spend, I might take another 30 minutes a day reading book reviews to select my purchases.
That still leaves me four more periods a day plus my contract-mandated duty-free lunch period (which I hardly ever take – I read trade magazines and answer work emails while I eat).
I reminded him that I did a lot of different things before becoming a teacher and I carry a diverse set of skills he could take advantage of and gave him suggestions on how I might be more useful to him and the school.
I could write grants. I write and win a couple or three for the library each year. My record is seven applied for, six won. When an assistant principal needed an essay for a grant proposal she was submitting that day, I wrote what she called a great one in twenty minutes. I could write more.
I could plan and do PD. We used to get a lot of PD on differentiating lessons but none of it was differentiated. When I pointed that out to my principal he said there wasn’t enough time to plan differentiating it. I managed to hold my tongue and not point out that teachers, too, are under time pressure, what with all the paperwork they have to do. I could plan differentiated PD – more differentiated than he might imagine (unconference model; Educon conversation model, EdCamp model, etc.). I could create PD on Project-Based Learning, on interdisciplinary unit design, on becoming a connected educator, and more.
I could create, or facilitate students creating a webpage for the school. Right now we have the dull, cookie-cutter NYCDOE school webpage and it doesn’t give a clue about who we are, what we do, how we do it, or any of the great things happening in our school. I’m currently working with three sixth grade classes to develop a website for our library – right now they’re deciding what will be on the site and the more artistic students are investigating other school and library sites to get design ideas (and a list of things not to do!).
I could produce an online school magazine.
I could, I could, I could.
I’ll let you know how he responds.
22 Comments | Education, Leadership, Learning, Library, Students, Teachers, Teaching, Technology, Uncategorized | Tagged: communication, differentiation, Education, labor, Librarian, Libraries, Library, Project-based learning | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
It started with this question: Why aren’t our students making more progress?
One day late last week a third of the staff stayed more than two hours after school to discuss the possibility of our becoming a magnet school of sorts. The sort isn’t important, but the conversations about it are.
No one had asked that question before. We’d been told that we had to have our students make progress and we’ve been given a host of different programs to cause that to happen, but none of it was working.
In small groups we had serious conversations to answer that question. Among other ideas, each group mentioned a lack of student motivation as a major part of the problem. In response my principal said words that I never expected to come from his mouth, words I’d been saying and writing for a number of years. “The reason our students are not motivated is because school is not working for them.”
It’s not the students’ fault, he said, and not the teachers’ either.
“Students are not motivated because the way we do school, the structure of the day, the changing of classes at 42 minute intervals, isolation of subject areas from each other, none of it is working.”
For a moment it was silent. Then the conversations started. We talked about our own positive and negative experiences in school and why they occurred. We talked about how we’d change the structure of the day, the physical plant of the school, the curriculum.
Some were defensive, feeling that what they do and how they do it was under attack. We agreed that some kids thrive in the current mode of operation. Others were for change. There were even a couple who, like me, were ready to trash the system and start over.
We won’t get the opportunity to do that. And we may not win the $3,000,000 grant that would allow us to make a lot of changes and train ourselves on how to make them work. It’s not that the grant doesn’t matter, but one of the most important parts of the change has already occurred.
It happened when our principal asked that question and created an anything-goes safe zone in which we could explore answers.
Now that the conversation has started, it is up to us to keep it going.
We are the change that needs to happen.
9 Comments | Assessment, Behavior, classroom management, Curriculum, Education, Equity, History, Leadership, Learning, Policy, Students, Teachers, Teaching, Technology, Uncategorized | Tagged: conversation, curriculum, differentiation, Education, Education reform, inquiry, Learning, Magnet school, Policy, Public school, questions, student, teacher | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg opening the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The mayor of New York City, an incredibly wealthy man named Michael Bloomberg, compared my union, the United Federation of Teachers to the National Rifle Association because we will not agree to a deeply flawed, poorly thought out system of rating teachers.
The mayor thinks what he wants and expresses himself in whatever way he chooses. No one need comment on his incredible statement because it speaks very loudly on its own about what kind of man is running New York City and the New York City schools.
But the mayor is right about one thing. My union is refusing to cave into his and the state’s demand that we accept a teacher-rating system that is largely based on student performance on standardized tests.
The NY Post reports that teachers who rate poorly on the current system are offered satisfactory final ratings if they resign. Teacher evaluations have always been political — one intent of all this testing is to eliminate subjective rating, but it just moves it into sleazier territory. What the City is saying, in essence, is we think you’re a bad teacher but we’ll tell some other district that you apply to that you’re an okay teacher and let them take their chances. Doubly dishonest, and this is what we model for our students.
The problem is, there is absolutely no way to rate the effectiveness teachers because the result of what we do or don’t do in the classroom is not readily apparent in any meaningful way for several years at best and by then it is impossible to tell what influence any one or collection of teachers had, as if it were ever possible.
In my life, all the really influential teachers retired or died before the fruits of their influence developed enough to become apparent to me, much less anyone else.
The problem is we’re educating for the long run and the powers that be keep trying to assess us on the short run.
It is like judging the health of a business based on its performance in one or two quarters. By that standard, Enron looked fantastic, just like all the slick no-credit-check mega-mortgages and the derivatives based on them. We all know how that turned out
If they really want us to teach for short-term student gains we all can do it, we know how, but that is not what our students need and most definitely is not what our society needs.
Just like in business, taking the long view might not work out as well for the current investors, but is often advantageous for the society as a whole.
4 Comments | Contemporary Issues, Education, Leadership, Learning, Policy, Students, Teachers, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged: Assessment, Education reform, Educators, labor, Learning, NYC Department of Education, Policy, Standardized test | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
English: New York City Police officers being debriefed by their lieutenant (in the white shirt) in Times Square, May 29, 2010. Photo by Luigi Novi.
I didn’t plan to write about it again. I’d said my piece and I was going to let it go at that. Then I saw this slide show of politicians eager to arm teachers on the Huffington Post website and it made me think of these headlines.
If trained policemen, who have almost unlimited opportunity to practice shooting can’t manage to use their guns safely, what on earth makes these politicians and all the other people advocating arming teachers or otherwise putting guns in school think that it will turn out well.
The NRA and other gun advocates often accuse people trying to limit the amount of fire power accessible by the average citizen of having knee-jerk over-reactions to instances of gun violence.
Perhaps, but that door swings both ways.
It is time to put our knees back in place and start reacting with our brains instead. Everyone has too much to lose if we can’t figure out how to let sport shooters and hunters have guns, even let the average citizen have a shotgun or six-shooter while also denying anyone but the military access to automatic weapons AND keep most of us safe from gun violence most of the time.
Leave a Comment » | Contemporary Issues, Leadership, Policy, Students, Teachers, Uncategorized | Tagged: Automatic firearm, classroom, Educators, empathy, Gun, Gun violence, Huffington Post, National Rifle Association, NRA, Police, Policy, Sandy Hook, teacher | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
Saturday evening I sat in a darkened theater, wearing a tuxedo for the first time in almost 40 years, for the first presentations of what might be annual awards for excellence in education.
I am sitting among a group of education bloggers who will be called up on stage and recognized for our work.We’re being treated like movie stars, photographed and video interviewed on the red carpet on our way into the Arena Stage in Washington, DC.
As much fun as it is to see people I have come to know, respect and learn with all dressed up, the men handsome and the women beautiful in our finery, this feels weird, bizarre and more than a little uncomfortable.
That this feels so strange is precisely what is wrong with the Bammy Awards for Excellence in Education — that it is so outlandish for educators to get red carpet treatment, hear kind words and receive weighty trophies. We have become far more used to being blamed, attacked, criticized, sniped-at and otherwise vilified.
The Bammy Awards are a calculated response to the cynical, damaging and dangerous negative images of teachers and other educators being presented to the public.
In the process of recognizing exceptional teachers, administrators, school maintenance managers, education reporters and school nurses the Bammy Awards ask a challenging and important question: What would happen if we treated teachers with the same high regard we give to entertainers, sport stars and other celebrities?
What would happen, how would things change, if we showed teachers appreciation, respect, perhaps even admiration for their work, their experience and their dedication instead of treating them with contempt.
What would happen if we built educators up instead of tearing them down; what if we helped teachers feel good bout themselves instead of causing them to question their choice to teach in the first place.
What would change if we recognized the professionalism of teachers the way they do in Finland and Singapore?
5 Comments | Contemporary Issues, Education, Leadership, Learning, Philosophy, Policy, Teachers, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged: Arena Stage, Education, Education reform, Educators, empathy, recognition, School nursing, teacher, Teaching | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
English: Looking northeast across Lex and 91st at 92nd Street Y. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Sometimes you get more than you pay for.
That is certainly the case with the #140edu conference next week at the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan where, if you are a teacher or student, $1.40 buys you two days of ideas, inspiration, conversation and connection with some of the more thoughtful, challenging, and engaging educators who have used social media in their classrooms or individual learning.
I should warn you, these are long days. Both of them, July 31 and August 1, start at 8:30AM and run until 5:45PM, with only 45 minutes for lunch, but don’t worry. You don’t have to sit and listen to it all. You can get up, walk out, go to the networking room or step outside, then go back for more. Trust me, you will need to do this because your head will explode if you don’t.
Just plan to be back in the hall by 11:50AM on the first day. That’s when I’ll be talking about How to Make Dropping Out of School Work for You. I don’t want to go into my whole talk here, but the thesis is that one can get an equivalent or better education using social media as one can by attending high school. I have no idea how I got included with the otherwise distinguished list of educators presenting here, but I did. Please come and disagree with me. Educators can register here for just $1.40 for the two days (you can disagree with a lot of people and make the conference even more cost effective if you like).
English: Infographic on how Social Media are being used, and how everything is changed by them. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
If you do go, and I hope you will, please come and say hello. I’ll be the one with the exploded head.
2 Comments | Accessibility, Assessment, Behavior, Contemporary Issues, Curriculum, Disability, Education, Equity, Ethics, Leadership, Learning, Parents, Philosophy, Policy, Politics, Students, Teachers, Teaching, Technology, Uncategorized, Unions | Tagged: communication, context, Education, Learning, New York, twitter, words | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
Detail of Lewis Carroll memorial window This is the bottom central pane of the memorial window – see  (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I know I shouldn’t be surprised. I know I should be used to it by now.
But it still gets to me when I see how duplicitous, disingenuous, distrustful and distant our government and education leaders are.
So much so that they are dangerous.
Education in the state of New York is under the control of a Board of Regents. They run the Department of Education and oversee every school district in the state. They set the rules for graduation and all the other rules governing how schooling is done in the state.
They also license barbers. They should stick to that and give up all the rest. Here’s why.
As early as 1995, the New York Board of Regents called for higher standards of education and stricter requirements for graduation from high school. Then they raised the standards.
This is from a report of the Public Policy Institute, a business group:
“In April of 1996, the state Board of Regents acted unanimously to set new standards that will require students in New York State to pass Regents exams in order to receive a high-school diploma. These exams, which formerly were required only of students going for the optional Regents Diploma, are the centerpiece of New York’s effort to upgrade educational outcomes.”
Regents Exams are content specific tests unique to New York. They were not new when I was alternately attending and dropping out of high schools in the late 1960s.
Then in 2011, the Regents announced they were raising standards again, making the tests more rigorous to show how important education is in NY and to show how well prepared NY students are for college and unstable career paths
All well and good, you say. High expectations and high standards are important. I agree.
The NY Regents are about to take another vote on setting high standards for NY students, only this time they’re likely to vote to get rid of the Global History Regents Exam because, get ready for this, because too few students pass it.
They want to make the test optional, perhaps replace it with an extra math or science test.
Here is the August, 2010 Global History Regents. Do you think students should know the answers to most of these questions?
Do the Regents try to figure out why students don’t pass the test? Do the Regents try improving social studies education so that students are better prepared for the test? Do they try developing resources to help students understand the importance of having a grasp of history?
No, the Regents go about the process of raising standards by lowering them.
`That’s the reason they’re called lessons,’ the Gryphon remarked: `because they lessen from day to day.’
– Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll, Chapter IX (that’s nine, NY Regents).
Leave a Comment » | Assessment, Contemporary Issues, Curriculum, Education, Ethics, History, Leadership, Learning, Policy, Social Studies, Uncategorized | Tagged: Assessment, curriculum, Education, Education reform, Higher education governing board, Lewis Carroll, New York, New York State, Policy, Regents, Regents Examinations, Social Studies, University of the State of New York | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
Teachers (Photo credit: iwannt)
The NY State Education Department has issued GUIDANCE ON NEW YORK STATE’S ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS TO IMPLEMENT EDUCATION LAW §3012-c AND THE COMMISSIONER’S REGULATIONS.
This is the detailed explanation of how Race to the Top bribes have caused the state to assess teachers based on, among a very few other things, student performance on standardized tests. Most of it talks about ELA and Math teachers in grades 4-8 because those subject are the ones for which there are currently standardized exams, as faulty as they are (I’m sure you’ve heard of the pineapple problem; the multiple choice math questions, one with two right answers and the other with none).
Teachers will also be assessed by their principal as to whether they have met Student Learning Objectives. All teachers, except pre-K teachers are included, whether or not they teach subjects covered by standardized exams.
There’s a complex explanation of how the percentages of the influence on student learning any one teacher has will be computed. Examples of the math involved in that are not likely to show up on state tests because I doubt whether most mathematicians would understand it.
The document makes very clear that “School librarians and career and technical teachers are teachers in the classroom teaching service and are, therefore, subject to the new law beginning in the 2012-2013 school year.” (page 17)
How are SLOs for Library/Media Specialists established if these teachers do not
have regular classes scheduled and only schedule on-demand/teacher-requested
basis for specific topics and projects? (page 41)
Districts/BOCES will need to determine their specific rules around which courses must have SLOs when contact time varies following the State’s rules and the general principle of including the courses with the most students first and making practical judgments about how to consider different course meeting schedules like those in this example.
2 Comments | Assessment, Contemporary Issues, Education, language, Leadership, Learning, Library, Policy, Politics, Social Studies, Students, Teachers, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged: Annual professional performance review, Assessment, Education, Librarians, Libraries, Mathematics, New York, Policy, Public school, Race to the Top, Standardized test, teacher, United States | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black
American westward expansion is idealized in Emanuel Leutze's famous painting Westward the Course of Empire Takes its Way (1861). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
It has always been paradox to me that teachers face demands to teach differentially to address learning individualities but only standardized assessment seems to count.
Perhaps there is some confusion. Some people, even some education officials and legislators, seem to think ‘standardized’ refers to holding students to standards, possibly even high ones.
That is not the case.
Standardized just means everyone takes the same test, not for the benefit of students, individually or collectively, but to make it easier for politicians and the media to rank states and districts competitively and mislead parents to think that there is some educational validity to those rankings.
There is not.
Our education system is broken. Taxpayers want to buy an Aston Martin but at Dodge Dart prices. Politicians want to brag or criticize without understanding what they are talking about.
Everyone admires Finland and Singapore but no one wants to make the same investment they make in teacher preparation, ongoing training and providing time for collaboration and reflection. No one seems to care that despite all the wonderful schooling students in Singapore and Finland get, and despite the fact that all those students and their families have adequate housing and healthcare, immigrants still come here, not there, for opportunities for better lives.
That, my friends, is our greatest national asset and its a pity that so few of our leaders are either able to recognize that or willing to acknowledge it.
CATTLE DRIVE - NARA - 543787 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
We suffer from a failure of leadership. It is not a Democrat problem. It is not a Republican problem. It is a national problem, a continuing and deepening of the long-running fantasy narration of rugged individualism in which we tell ourselves that it is the poor’s fault that they are poor, it is the teacher’s fault that education policies don’t work, and, at those times when crime is high, it is the policeman’s fault for eating donuts instead of battling crooks.
Perhaps someday each of us will take responsibility for the direction our nation is heading, take responsibility for our communities, our neighbors and ourselves. I’ll know when that happens because 90% of the eligible voters will cast ballots and show the politicians and policy makers that we really care. Perhaps then we can start addressing problems, trying to fix problems instead of cynically casting blame for them.
1 Comment | Assessment, Contemporary Issues, Education, Equity, Ethics, Leadership, Media, Philosophy, Policy, Politics, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged: Assessment, Democratic Party (United States), differentiation, Education, equity, Finland, Policy, Republican Party (United States), Singapore, Standardized test, United States | Permalink
Posted by Deven Black