I don’t know how many of my students listened to the State of the Union address tonight, but I can help them understand the emphasised points in the speech by showing them this Wordle of it.
The Name of the Game
01/11/2010- Image by Parvin ♣( OFF / ON ) via Flickr
I’ve been hanging around after school more than usual lately.
I usually come in very early and leave as close to three as I can, but lately I’ve been having too much fun to leave.
I’ve been teaching some of my sixth grade girls a game.
The girls are part of our popular after-school program and they’re supposed to be in the classroom opposite mine with a teacher who is actually paid to be there, but they hang out with me when they can.
The game I teach is called Petals Around the Rose and the name is important.
If you know the game, skip the next two paragraphs to the crux of the story while I explain the game to everyone else.
In the game I roll five dice and announce a score. The object of the game is to figure out why the score is what I say it is. I keep rolling the dice and announcing scores until you start telling me the scores before I tell you.
The scores follow a rule and you win by spotting the pattern and determining the rule I follow. If a student does they are beholden not to reveal the secret and I give them dice so they can start to teach the game to others.
S got it today.
S is a small, thin serious-minded girl with a winning smile and a huge dose of self-assurance. She is very bright, takes intellectual risks and is an absolute delight to have in the class.
I started playing the game with S and three other girls on Friday. We played for almost three hours. Each of the other girls walked away from the table from time to time. Not S.
S sat there making notes, making charts, getting frustrated, laughing, and shooting me skeptical looks.
I kept telling her the name of the game, Petals Around the Rose and that the name was important. I also told her that she would feel so good when she finally got it.
S sent me an email on Sunday evening telling me she’d been puzzling over the game all weekend and chiding me for torturing her.
As soon as she saw me today she said, “After school we’re playing the game.”
It took me three days of playing two hours a day or so to figure out the game.
It took S another two hours today.
I am so used to students who frustrate quickly and fly off the handle. I really enjoyed watching S struggle with the game but keep going. I admire her persistence, her determination, and her grit.
When she finally got it her excitement was electrifying. At times when she got frustrated I told her she’d feel good when she got it, and she told me she had never felt as good.
I gave her the dice we used as a prize. She immediately went across the hall, she said to celebrate.
When I looked into that class on my way out the door five minutes later, S had a crowd of ten students around her and she was rolling the dice.
Students often ask when they will ever use what we try to teach them, and teachers often wonder why the students don’t use what we’ve taught.
S never asked why I was teaching her the game, and I got to see her use it right away.
Priceless.
I’ve Got Money; Are You Available?
01/08/2010- Image by Getty Images via Daylife
News item: Gov. David A. Paterson on Thursday proposed a host of changes in state education law, including eliminating the cap on the number of charter schools, which he said would make the state more likely to receive $700 million in federal grant money. (NY Times 1/8/2010)
If we ever needed proof that – despite all the promises, platitudes and protestations – no politician gives a damn about students, this is it.
From the moment President Obama renamed No Child Left Behind (a giant, expensive race to mediocrity) with the equally catchy and vacuous Race To the Top, governors and state legislatures have been eager to lay down and spread them as any Nevada hooker offered the right price.
Harsh?
Perhaps, but not nearly as harsh as the way those officials charged with making the policies that rule their educational lives treat students.
Just so I am not misunderstood, let me say it loud and clear:
Nothing any politician says or does about education is about children.
Nothing.
Everything they do and say is about money, power, or reelection, usually all three simultaneously.
This Race to the Top is just another attempt to hold the gun of money against the head of state government and attempting to justify it by claiming the gun holds a silver bullet.
I don’t know what races President Obama, Governor Patterson or any other governor shining their red light has watched, but every race I’ve seen has had a small number of winners, usually one, and a much larger number of losers.
That’s right.
Our persuasive President’s education plan promotes there being a large number of education losers.
This is why he, Duncan, Klein and Rhee despise teachers so much. Teachers know there are no silver bullets.
None.
Not charter schools, not standardized assessments. not centralized authority and not union busting.
But also not technology, not better-trained teachers, not smaller classes and not fewer exams.
Some combination of all the above may do wonders, but there are no silver bullets.
None.
Governor Patterson, that gun held against your head holds blanks. Sure it makes a loud bang, but it will not hurt you.
The only ones hurt will be the students.
I guess that’s okay with you.
After all, it is not about them, is it?